Prediction of Aisam Qureshi vs Nathan Healey Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
A. Qureshi vs N. Healey

Aisam Qureshi

PAK

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

464

C. Rank

Ret.

125

Best Rank

159

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$56.5K

Career Money

$111.2K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nathan Healey

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

464

C. Rank

Ret.

125

Best Rank

159

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$56.5K

Career Money

$111.2K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Qureshi 1 - 0 Healey

They have played 3 sets in total, with Aisam Qureshi winning 2 and Nathan Healey winning 1. The last match between Aisam Qureshi and Nathan Healey was at the Campbell's Hall of Fame Tennis Championships - Newport, 11-07-2007, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(2) 5-7 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Qureshi	1
Healey	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Campbell's Hall of Fame Tennis Championships - Newport(07-11-07)

Stats

Aisam Qureshi

Nathan Healey

A. Qureshi vs N. Healey H2H Profile

A. Qureshi	Stats	N. Healey
$56,455	Career Prize Money	$111,195
55.04% (284-232)	Career Total W/L	52.89% (183-163)
1	Grass	0
8	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

A. Qureshi vs N. Healey Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Aisam Qureshi has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nathan Healey has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Aisam Qureshi, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nathan Healey has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Aisam Qureshi has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nathan Healey has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Aisam Qureshi has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nathan Healey winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Aisam Qureshi has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 80/57), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 26/33). Nathan Healey has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 36/22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 22/28).
Player level: In the last year, Aisam Qureshi has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nathan Healey has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Aisam Qureshi winning 1 times and Nathan Healey being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Aisam Qureshi winning 2 and Nathan Healey winning 1.
The last match between Aisam Qureshi and Nathan Healey was at the Campbell's Hall of Fame Tennis Championships - Newport, 11-07-2007, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(2) 5-7 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Aisam Qureshi has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nathan Healey has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Aisam Qureshi has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nathan Healey has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Aisam Qureshi has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nathan Healey has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Aisam Qureshi vs Nathan Healey Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Qureshi vs N. Healey H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

A. Qureshi	Stats	N. Healey
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
18	Games Won	17
14	Aces (Total)	9
5	Total Double Faults	13
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
52% (57/109)	1st Serve %	57% (64/113)
77% (44/57)	1st Serve Win %	81% (52/64)
60% (31/52)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (21/49)
33% (2/6)	Break Pts Won %	20% (2/10)
35% (40/113)	Return Points Win %	31% (34/109)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

A. Qureshi Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Davis Cup, Group I, PO, PAK-IND 0-4 - 29-01-2024
Rubber 1 Ramkumar RamanathanR. Ramanathan	L	6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-0	Stats
Davis Cup, Group II, 1R, PAK-INA 5-0 - 11-09-2023
Rubber 2 David Agung SusantoD. Agung	W	6-1 6-4	Stats
Davis Cup, Group I, PO, PAK-LTU 3-2 - 28-02-2022
Rubber 5 Edas ButvilasE. Butvilas	W	6-4 7-6(2)	Stats
Davis Cup, Group I, 1R, PAK-JPN 0-4 - 01-03-2021
Rubber 2 Kaichi UchidaK. Uchida	L	6-4 7-6(4)	Stats
Davis Cup, World Group I, PO, PAK-SLO 3-0 - 02-03-2020
Rubber 1 Nik RazborsekN. Razborsek	W	4-6 7-5 7-6(1)	Stats

View All

N. Healey Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Usa F12 - 08-06-2009
R1 Lester CookL. Cook	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Yuba City Challenger - 01-06-2009
Q1 Tim SmyczekT. Smyczek	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Ford Tennis Championships - Louisville - 27-10-2008
Q1 Shane CollinsS. Collins	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
Q2 Ryan SweetingR. Sweeting	L	6-3 7-6(1)	Stats
The Mercedes Benz of Calabasas - Calabasas - 13-10-2008
Q3 Tobias ClemensT. Clemens	L	3-6 6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

A. Qureshi vs N. Healey Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

A. Qureshi	Stats	N. Healey
55.04% (284/232)	YTD Win/Loss	52.89% (183/163)
55.15% (702/571)	Sets Win/Loss	53.31% (435/381)
51.60% (6562/6155)	Games Win/Loss	51.67% (4091/3827)
57.64% (132/97)	Hard Win/Loss	53.99% (115/98)
48.39% (15/16)	Clay Win/Loss	44.00% (22/28)
47.90% (57/62)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.00% (10/15)
58.39% (80/57)	Grass Win/Loss	62.07% (36/22)
0.09	Aces Per Game	0.05
571	Aces Total	208
0.04	Double Faults Per Game	0.05
227	Total Double Faults	196
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
474.98	Average Opponent Rank	493.21
62% (2653/4299)	1st Serve %	58% (1370/2374)
78% (2061/2653)	1st Serve Win %	72% (988/1370)
50% (820/1641)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (479/996)
36% (102/287)	Break Points Won % (Total)	34% (70/204)
33% (1411/4237)	Return Points Win %	35% (804/2296)
46.88% (15/17)	Slam W/L	50.00% (11/11)
0% (0/0)	Masters W/L	25.00% (1/3)
59.09% (26/18)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/1)
50.00% (37/37)	Main Tour W/L	44.78% (30/37)
50.18% (137/136)	Challenger W/L	52.04% (102/94)
74.19% (69/24)	Futures W/L	69.64% (39/17)
55% (254/465)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (176/327)
58% (25/43)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	27% (3/11)
55% (157/285)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	44% (63/143)
45% (85/187)	Deciding Set Win %	44% (51/117)
79% (315/249)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (192/157)
20% (315/62)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (192/35)
17% (201/35)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (154/25)